<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>30 verses &#8211; White Minaret</title>
	<atom:link href="https://whiteminaret.org/category/doj/quran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://whiteminaret.org</link>
	<description>The Messenger Of Allah ﷺ said: “Whoever dies without an Imam will die a death of Jahiliyyah”  (Musnad Ahmad)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2024 03:46:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Quran &#8211; 3:55</title>
		<link>https://whiteminaret.org/doj/quran/3-55/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=3-55</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[True Islam Discord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 16:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[30 verses]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://whiteminrat.wpcomstaging.com/quran-3-55-2/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In this article, we will explain how the following verse proves that Isa (A.S) has died a natural death. Verse اِذۡ قَالَ اللّٰہُ یٰعِیۡسٰۤی اِنِّیۡ مُتَوَفِّیۡکَ وَ رَافِعُکَ اِلَیَّ وَ مُطَہِّرُکَ مِنَ الَّذِیۡنَ کَفَرُوۡا وَ جَاعِلُ الَّذِیۡنَ اتَّبَعُوۡکَ فَوۡقَ الَّذِیۡنَ کَفَرُوۡۤا اِلٰی یَوۡمِ الۡقِیٰمَۃِ ۚ ثُمَّ اِلَیَّ مَرۡجِعُکُمۡ فَاَحۡکُمُ بَیۡنَکُمۡ . . . <a class="readmore-link" href="https://whiteminaret.org/doj/quran/3-55/">Read more</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>In this article, we will explain how the following verse proves that Isa (A.S) has died a natural death.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Verse</h2>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-right">اِذۡ قَالَ اللّٰہُ <strong>یٰعِیۡسٰۤی اِنِّیۡ مُتَوَفِّیۡکَ وَ رَافِعُکَ اِلَیَّ</strong> وَ مُطَہِّرُکَ مِنَ الَّذِیۡنَ کَفَرُوۡا وَ جَاعِلُ الَّذِیۡنَ اتَّبَعُوۡکَ فَوۡقَ الَّذِیۡنَ کَفَرُوۡۤا اِلٰی یَوۡمِ الۡقِیٰمَۃِ ۚ ثُمَّ اِلَیَّ مَرۡجِعُکُمۡ فَاَحۡکُمُ بَیۡنَکُمۡ فِیۡمَا کُنۡتُمۡ فِیۡہِ تَخۡتَلِفُوۡنَ</p>



<p><em>When Allah said, ‘</em><strong><em>O Jesus, I will cause thee to die a natural death and will exalt thee to Myself</em></strong><em>, and will clear thee from the charges of those who disbelieve, and will place those who follow thee above those who disbelieve, until the Day of Resurrection; then to Me shall be your return, and I will judge between you concerning that wherein you differ.</em></p>
<cite>[<a href="https://www.alislam.org/quran/app/3:56" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Quran 3:55</a>]</cite></blockquote>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Context</h2>



<p>This verse very clearly and specifically talks about the natural death of Isa (A.S) and his spiritual exaltation towards Allah. Allah destroys the evil plans of the Jews, as mentioned in the previous verse “<em>And they planned, and Allah also planned; and Allah is the Best of planners</em>” (3:54). This plan of Jews is also recorded in 4:158, which was to crucify Isa (A.S) and humiliate him. </p>



<p>Crucifixion in their eyes meant that Isa (AS) would be accursed and proven a liar if he dies on the cross as per Deuteronomy 21:23. Hence Allah reveals that he will be the one to take his life (natural death), and the Jews will not be able to prove that he is accursed; instead, Allah will do the opposite i.e his Rafa unto Himself (spiritual exaltation).</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Meaning of Tawaffa</h2>



<p>Allah clearly says “<strong>اِنِّیۡ مُتَوَفِّیۡکَ</strong>” meaning “I will cause thee to die a natural death.” It cannot mean anything else in this context. Tawaffa (توفى) is an Arabic verb that means to take something. When Allah does Tawaffi of a human, it ONLY means taking of the soul. This can be at the time of death, or sleep if night is mentioned. There is no other meaning for it.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>Tawaffa is used 25 times in the Quran. It means “<em>Taking of the soul</em>” every single time. <a href="https://whiteminaret.org/doj/tawaffa/quran/" data-type="post" data-id="11">Check here</a>.</li>



<li>Tawaffa is used many times in ahadith. It means “<em>Taking of the soul</em>” every single time. <a href="https://whiteminaret.org/doj/tawaffa/tawaffa-in-hadith/" data-type="post" data-id="5814">Check here</a>.</li>



<li>Muhammad (S.A.W) and Ali (R.A) translate Tawaffa as “death”. <a href="https://whiteminaret.org/doj/quran/5-117/#Proof_1" data-type="post" data-id="13">Check here</a>.</li>



<li>Arabic lexicons say that it means “Taking of the soul”. <a href="https://whiteminaret.org/doj/tawaffa/lexicons/" data-type="post" data-id="3497">Check here</a>.</li>



<li>Non-Ahmadi (Sunni and Shias) agree that it means “<em>Taking of the soul</em>”. <a href="https://whiteminaret.org/doj/scholars/non-ahmadi-translations/" data-type="post" data-id="47">Check here</a>.</li>



<li>The challenge of the Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (A.S) to show an example that says “<em>Take me</em>”. <a href="https://whiteminaret.org/doj/tawaffa/claim-of-huzur-as/" data-type="post" data-id="41">Check here</a>.</li>
</ol>



<p>We just showed the general meaning of the word Tawaffa. No one can deny that it means anything but taking of the soul. In Surah Az-Zumar, Allah explains that there are only two ways He does the Tawaffa of humans. The first is at the time of their death and the second is at the time of sleep. There is no other meaning.</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><strong><em>Allah takes away the souls of human beings at the time of their death; and of those also that are not yet dead, during their sleep</em></strong><em>. And then He retains those against which He has decreed death, and sends back the others till an appointed term. In that surely are Signs for a people who reflect.</em></p>
<cite>[<a href="https://www.alislam.org/quran/app/39:43" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Quran 39:42</a>]</cite></blockquote>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Translation of Ibn Abbas (RA)</h3>



<p>The greatest Mufassir of the Holy Quran specifically does tafsir of this very verse and translates the word as death too. This narration is in the most authentic book after the Holy Quran, under the chapter called “<em>Kitabul Tafsir</em>” (Book of Exegete).</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-right">وَقَالَ ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ: {مُتَوَفِّيكَ} مُمِيتُكَ</p>



<p>Ibn Abbas (R.A) said, “<strong><em>Mutawaffika (مُتَوَفِّيكَ) means death.</em></strong>”</p>
<cite><a href="https://whiteminaret.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tawaffa-ibnabbas-bukhari-mutawaffika.png">[Sahih al-Bukhari p.745]</a></cite></blockquote>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Refutations of Non-Ahmadi Argument</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Argument 1:</h3>



<p>The word <strong>مُتَوَفِّیۡکَ</strong> does not mean death but means to “take” meaning that Allah took Isa (A.S) to heaven physically.</p>



<p><strong><em>Firstly</em></strong>, we have already proven that Tawaffa does indeed mean to take but as per Quran, Ahadith, and Lexicons when Allah takes a human, it means &#8220;<em>taking of the soul</em>&#8220;. It never means taking someone with body and soul.</p>



<p><strong><em>Secondly</em></strong>, even if we assume it means to take with the body, where does it say &#8220;taking to heaven&#8221;?</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Argument 2:</h3>



<p>The narration of Ibn Abbas (RA) is weak, even though it is in Sahih Bukhari. There are multiple reasons the give:</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1) There is no Isnad (Chain of narrators)</h4>



<p>This is an extremely immature allegation of Imam Bukhari (R.H) himself. Why would he meticulously compile the most authentic ahadith that we have ever seen, and yet be so neglectful to add weak narrations with no Isnad? Sunnis will attack anyone just to go against Ahmadis. Nevertheless, according to the Tafsir of Sahih Bukhari, when Imam Bukhari (R.H) leaves the Isnad out, he is personally taking responsibility and commanding it to be authentic.</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-right">أكثر البخاري من أحاديث وأقوال الصحابة وغيرهم بغير إسناد فإن كان بصيغة جزم كقال وروى ونحوهما فهو حكم منه بصحته</p>



<p><em>Most of Al-Bukhari’s hadiths and sayings of the Companions and others without chain of narrators. </em><strong><em>If it is in the form of assertiveness, such as what Qala (he said), Rawa (he narrated), and the like, then it is a judgment of it, is sahih.</em></strong></p>



<p></p>
<cite>[<a href="https://whiteminaret.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/mutawaffika-sharh-ayni.jpg" data-type="URL" data-id="https://whiteminaret.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/mutawaffika-sharh-ayni.jpg">Umdat al-Qari, Sharh Sahih al-Bukhari, pg 32</a>]</cite></blockquote>



<p>Nevertheless, we will still show the Isnad as is mentioned in multiple books of classical scholars so no excuse is left.</p>



<p><strong>1) Tafsir Al Tabari</strong></p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-right">ذِكْرُ مَنْ قَالَ ذَلِكَ: حَدَّثَنِي الْمُثَنَّى، قَالَ: ثنا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ صَالِحٍ، قَالَ: ثني مُعَاوِيَةُ، عَنْ عَلِيٍّ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ، قَوْلُهُ: {إِنِّي مُتَوَفِّيكَ} [آل عمران: 55] يَقُولُ: «إِنِّي مُمِيتُكَ»</p>
<cite>(تفسير جامع البيان في تفسير القرآن، الطبري ت 310 هـ)</cite></blockquote>



<p><strong>2) Tafsir Ibn Abi Hatim, </strong><em>Volume 2, Page 661</em></p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-right">حَدَّثَنَا أَبِي ثنا أَبُو صَالِحٍ، حَدَّثَنِي مُعَاوِيَةُ بْنُ صَالِحٍ، عَنْ عَلِيِّ بْنِ أَبِي طَلْحَةَ، عن ابن عَبَّاسٍ قَوْلُهُ: إِنِّي مُتَوَفِّيكَ يَقُولُ: إِنِّي مُمِيتُكَ</p>
</blockquote>



<p><strong>3) Ibn Hajr (R.H)</strong></p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-right">وقال ابْنُ عَبَّاسٍ ” مُتَوَفِّيكَ : مُمِيتُكَ “. قَالَ ابْنُ أَبِي حَاتِمٍ : ثنا أَبِي ، ثنا أَبُو صَالِحٍ ، ثنا مُعَاوِيَةُ ، عَنْ عَلِيٍّ ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ، بِهَذَا.</p>
<cite>(تغليق التعليق لابن حجر» كتاب التفسير» من تفسير سورة المائدة 1410/206)</cite></blockquote>



<p><strong>4) Tafseer Ibn Al-Mundhir, </strong><em>Volume 1, Page 221</em></p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-right">حَدَّثَنَا أَبِي ثنا أَبُو صَالِحٍ، حَدَّثَنِي مُعَاوِيَةُ بْنُ صَالِحٍ، عَنْ عَلِيِّ بْنِ أَبِي طَلْحَةَ، عن ابن عَبَّاسٍ قَوْلُهُ: إِنِّي مُتَوَفِّيكَ يَقُولُ: إِنِّي مُمِيتُكَ</p>
</blockquote>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>2) This is a Muallaq narration</strong></h4>



<p>Another Sunni claim is that the narration is Muallaq and thus not authentic. Muallaq narrations are those that have one or more successive narrators omitted from the beginning of their chain. </p>



<p>This allegation shows an utter lack of knowledge in hadith sciences. Muhaddthin and Sunni scholars agree that <strong>Muallaq narrations of Imam Bukhari are indeed authentic if in affirmative or definitive form like <em>Qala (said) </em>or <em>Rawā (narrated)</em>. </strong>This is the case with the narration of Ibn Abbas (R.A) in Sahih Bukhari as it says “<em>Qala Ibn Abbas</em>”. Here are some of the proofs.</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><em>“</em><strong><em>According to the rules that the ulama&#8217; of hadith have generally upheld, the Mu&#8217;allaq aḥadīth of al-Bukhārī are considered as Sahih</em></strong><em> if the suspension is made in decisive words, such as qala (said), fa&#8217;ala (did), amara (commanded), nahā (prohibited), dhakara (mentioned), rawā (narrated) and so on. Suspension (ta liq) would not convey validity and soundness (şihha) if it occurs in a defective form or expression (sighat al-tamrid) such as &#8220;it is narrated from so and so&#8221; (yurma an kadha wa kadha), &#8220;it is said of him&#8221; (yuqalu &#8216;anhu), “it is mentioned, or narrated&#8221; (yudhkaru, yuḥkā) and the like, which are in any case usually not employed in the typical cases of ta&#8217;liq.”</em></p>
<cite>[<a href="https://whiteminaret.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/muallaq-hadithstudies-hashim-scaled.jpg" data-type="attachment" data-id="2446">A Textbook of Hadith Studies Authenticity, Compilation, Classification and Criticism of Hadith by Mohammad Hashim Kamali, p163</a>]</cite></blockquote>



<p>The two most famous Sunni websites also say the same:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><em>Mu‘allaq Hadeeths in Saheeh Al-Bukhari falls into two categories:</em></p>



<p><em>1. &nbsp; &nbsp; Those that he narrated with a definitive form, for example: when he says so-and-so said such-and-such or mentioned such-and-such&#8230; This method of narrating Mu‘allaq Hadeeths is considered </em><strong><em>a judgment by Al-Bukhari that these Hadeeths are authentically attributed to the person they are attributed to</em></strong><em>. This is because he would never have definitively attributed something to a certain narrator unless he had verified the authenticity of that attribution to that narrator.</em></p>



<p><em>2. &nbsp; &nbsp; Those with a less definitive form, for example, when he says, it was said or it was narrated on the authority of so and so&#8230;&nbsp; Hadeeths in this form are not necessarily authentic because this form of narration may be also used with Dha‘eef (weak) Hadeeths.</em></p>
<cite>[<a href="https://www.islamweb.net/en/fatwa/3925/status-of-muallaq-hadeeths-in-saheeh-al-bukhari" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Islamweb Fatwa (Sunni website)</a>]</cite></blockquote>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><em>From what the scholars have said about the methodology of Imam al-Bukhaari in narrating mu’allaq reports, we can divide his mu’allaq reports (of which there are one hundred and sixty) into two categories:&nbsp;</em></p>



<p><em>1- Those which were narrated in a decisive form, such as saying “He narrated…” and so on.</em></p>



<p><em>The ruling on these mu’allaq reports is that </em><strong><em>they are saheeh or hasan</em></strong><em>, because it is not possible for him to state that in a decisive form unless it was saheeh in his view. Rather there are some reports which meet his conditions but he reported them in mu’allaq form.&nbsp;</em></p>



<p><em>The scholars made an exception from this principle in the case of just one hadeeth, which is reported in mu&#8217;allaq form in the Book of Zakaah (2/525).</em></p>
<cite>[<a href="https://islamqa.info/en/answers/83754/ruling-on-muallaq-hadeeth" target="_blank" rel="noopener">IslamQA Answer (Sunni Website)</a>]</cite></blockquote>



<p>More references regarding Muallaq narrations in Sahih Bukhari can be found <a href="/misquotes/muallaq-ahadith-in-bukhari">here</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Argument 3:</h3>



<p>The word Mutawaffika (<strong>مُتَوَفِّیۡکَ)</strong> does not mean death but means to “sleep” meaning he was caused to sleep.</p>



<p><strong>Firstly</strong>, to claim the meaning that Allah is promising Isa (A.S) to cause him to sleep in this verse will be a mockery of the Quran. He has caused Isa (A.S) to sleep thousands of times before so why would He mention this in a verse specifically in the context of Quran 3:55 of Allah and the disbelievers both planning. Allah causing Isa (A.S) to sleep simply does not fit.</p>



<p><strong>Secondly</strong>, let’s look back at the Quran 5:117 where Isa (A.S) uses the word Tawaffa for himself. Let’s look at the verse through the lens of Isa (A.S) sleeping. If we take the meaning of Tawaffa as sleep, then in this context, Isa (A.S) would be saying “<em>I was a witness over them as long as I remained among them, but since Thou didst cause me to SLEEP (tawafaitani), Thou hast been the Watcher over them</em>”.</p>



<p>How is Isa (A.S) being exonerated in this verse by mentioning that since he was asleep, he does not know the condition of his people? How is sleep a good excuse for not knowing the misguidance of his people? How is this in the realm of reason by any standard?! What makes it even more absurd is that this is the statement of Isa (A.S) on the day of judgment.</p>



<p><strong>Thirdly</strong>, even if we take it to mean sleep, then his body is still asleep while the soul is alive in heaven which the Holy Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) saw on Mairaj. This means his soul and body are separated for at least 600 years.</p>



<p><strong>Fourthly</strong>, the strongest proof that it cannot mean sleep is that we have already shown 3 authentic narrations that show the Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W), Ali (R.A), and all prophets will use the word Tawaffa similarly, <strong>at the same time, in same context, and same place, i.e., the Day of Judgement</strong>. We know that Ali RA and the rest of the Prophets (A.S) have died. Why should we take this baseless interpretation against the clear interpretation in Sahih Ahadith? <a href="https://whiteminaret.org/doj/quran/5-117/" data-type="post" data-id="13">Read more on it here.</a></p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Argument 4:</h3>



<p>When they cannot prove <strong>مُتَوَفِّیۡکَ</strong> means to “take me”, they claim that it means death BUT it will happen on the 2nd coming. To back that up they quote a famous tafsir by Imam Suyuti and Imam Tabari which has this weak narration:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p class="has-text-align-right">عن ابن عباس في قوله { إني متوفيك ورافعك } يعني رافعك ثم متوفيك في آخر الزمان</p>



<p><em>It is narrated from Ibn Abbas about the Ayah “I’ll take you and raise you”; “It means I’ll raise you then will cause you to die near the End of Times.”</em></p>
<cite>[Durr Manthur 2/347 under 3:55]</cite></blockquote>



<p><strong>Firstly</strong>, this narration contradicts Quran 5:117 where Isa’s (A.S) death is mentioned in his first coming rather than the second. <a href="https://whiteminaret.org/doj/quran/5-117/" data-type="post" data-id="13">Check here</a>.</p>



<p><strong>Secondly</strong>, this view contradicts the belief of Ibn Abbas (R.A) himself as we have shown earlier. <a href="https://whiteminaret.org/misquotes/did-ibn-abbas-refer-to-isa-death-in-4159-qabla-mautihi/" data-type="post" data-id="1402">Check here</a>.</p>



<p><strong>Thirdly</strong>, this narration is weak as Sa’id ibn Juwabyr and Ad Dahak are weak narrators.</p>



<p><strong>Fourthly</strong>, Ad Dahak never met Ibn Abbas (R.A).</p>



<p><strong><em>Finally</em></strong>, this narration is weaker than the one quoted above. We quoted Sahih Bukhari&#8217;s narration which has a seal of authenticity by Imam Bukhari(R.H) himself while they are quoting one from Durr Manthur to counter it. Sahih Bukhari is the most authentic book after the Holy Quran. In comparison, Durr Manthur is not even part of the Sihae Sitta (6 most authentic books of hadith).</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Argument 5:</h3>



<p>When non-Ahmadis fail to prove mutawaffika means to take someone, or death only on the 2nd coming, they bring up another argument. They call it Taqdim Wa Tahkir meaning the “Rafa” of Isa (A.S) happened before his Tawaffi, thus they change the order with which it is mentioned in the Quran. This means that Tawaffa does indeed mean to die, but it will happen after his rafa (exaltation). In short, Isa (A.S) will be lifted to heaven alive, then sent back in the latter days, when he will die.</p>



<p>Let us quote the verse and see the order in which Allah chose the verse to be:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><em>“When Allah said, ‘O Jesus,<strong>I will cause thee to die a natural death and will exalt thee to Myself</strong>, and will clear thee from the charges of those who disbelieve, and will place those who follow thee above those who disbelieve, until the Day of Resurrection; then to Me shall be your return, and I will judge between you concerning that wherein you differ”</em></p>
<cite>[Quran 3:56]</cite></blockquote>



<p>As seen, the order in which Allah described the sequence of events is that Isa’s (AS) tawaffi happened first then his exaltation. Yet the non-Ahmadis persist in changing Allah’s order.</p>



<p>Their first attempt is to quote a weak narration attributed to Ibn Abbas, through Ad-Dahaak and Saeed Ibn juwaybir, who have unanimously been declared weak when reporting from Ibn Abbas. Some scholars who have rejected these narrators include Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, Al-Dhahabi, Imam an-Nasai and Imam al-Dar Qutni. These are 1% of the evidence for how this narration is very weak, however it will not be further expounded here.</p>



<p>Nevertheless, the non-Amazis cannot attribute this belief to Ibn Abbas, the greatest mufassir of the Quran.</p>



<p>They are now left to their thoughts, and their only thought now is to state “The order is switched just because it sounds nice to me”; if the non-Amazis simply ponder over this they would leave this belief at once. However, the false notion will still be refuted in several ways.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>1) The Christians went astray only after Isa AS’s Tawaffi.&nbsp;</strong></h4>



<p>Detailed response: Isa AS’s Tawaffi is mentioned twice in the Quran. Once at 3:55, and the other at 5:117 during judgment day. 5:117 states that:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>“I said nothing to them except that which Thou didst command me—‘Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.’ <strong>And I was a witness over them as long as I remained among them, but since Thou caused my Tawaffa, Thou hast been the Watcher over them; and Thou art Witness over all things.”</strong></p>
</blockquote>



<p>From this verse many things are clear:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list">
<li>Isa AS testified that his people were upon Tawheed as long as he remained among them preaching. (I said nothing to them except that which Thou didst command me—‘Worship Allah, my Lord, and your Lord.’ <strong>And I was a witness over them as long as I remained among them)</strong></li>



<li>It was only after Allah did the tawaffi of Isa AS, that he was not amongst his people anymore.</li>
</ol>



<p>After pondering over this, there is no reason for a non-Ahmadi to still hold this position. However, this false notion will still be refuted through a different angle:</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>2) Allah raises the status of humans, so even if we were to switch Tawaffi and Rafaa, it would mean that Allah would first exalt the status of Isa AS, then he would take his soul at death.&nbsp;</strong></h4>



<p>This would be in line with the Quranic verse:</p>



<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p><em>These Messengers have We exalted, some of them above others: among them there are those to whom Allah spoke; </em><strong><em>and some of them He exalted by degrees of rank. (2:254)</em></strong></p>
</blockquote>



<p>If we were to entertain this false notion of Taqdim wa Takhir, Isa AS’s Rafa would be the rafaa of this verse, meaning that he was exalted in rank, then Allah took his soul at death. So, even for argument’s sake if this notion was accepted, it would still not support the physical ascent and descent of Isa AS.</p>



<p>In conclusion, the Non-Ahmadis should truly ponder over how ridiculous this notion. If they switch the order of Tawaffi and Rafaa, what is stopping them from switching the order of the other parts of the verse?</p>



<p>“and will clear thee from the charges of those who disbelieve, and will place those who follow thee above those who disbelieve, until the Day of Resurrection; then to Me shall be your return, and I will judge between you concerning that wherein you differ”.</p>



<p>Why do the Non-Ahmadis not place the last part of the verse at the beginning, and what right do they have to say someone is wrong if they choose to do something like that?</p>



<p>The true meaning of the verse is that Allah will cause Isa AS to die, then raise his status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quran &#8211; 5:117</title>
		<link>https://whiteminaret.org/doj/quran/5-117/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=5-117</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[True Islam Discord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 20:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[30 verses]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://whiteminrat.wpcomstaging.com/quran-5-117/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The verses 116-117 from Surah Maidah, along with its Tafsir done by the Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) himself, is the most evident proof that Isa (AS) has indeed passed away, just like our Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W). Verse وَ اِذۡ قَالَ اللّٰہُ یٰعِیۡسَی ابۡنَ مَرۡیَمَ ءَاَنۡتَ قُلۡتَ لِلنَّاسِ اتَّخِذُوۡنِیۡ وَ اُمِّیَ اِلٰہَیۡنِ . . . <a class="readmore-link" href="https://whiteminaret.org/doj/quran/5-117/">Read more</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<article id="sections" class="sections">
<section class="page-section

      layout-engine-section

    background-width--full-bleed

      section-height--small

      content-width--wide

    horizontal-alignment--center
    vertical-alignment--middle

    "></p>
<div class="section-background"></div>
<div class="content-wrapper">
<div class="content">
<div id="page-section-61b4492bf3c0e913479527ed" class="sqs-layout sqs-grid-12 columns-12">
<div class="row sqs-row">
<div class="col sqs-col-12 span-12">
<div id="block-3432751a6704eaf5b1c7" class="sqs-block html-block sqs-block-html">
<div class="sqs-block-content">
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">The verses 116-117 from Surah Maidah, along with its Tafsir done by the Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W) himself, is the most evident proof that Isa (AS) has indeed passed away, just like our Prophet Muhammad (S.A.W).</p>
<h2 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Verse</h2>
<blockquote>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="text-align: right; white-space: pre-wrap;">وَ اِذۡ قَالَ اللّٰہُ یٰعِیۡسَی ابۡنَ مَرۡیَمَ ءَاَنۡتَ قُلۡتَ لِلنَّاسِ اتَّخِذُوۡنِیۡ وَ اُمِّیَ اِلٰہَیۡنِ مِنۡ دُوۡنِ اللّٰہِ ؕ قَالَ سُبۡحٰنَکَ مَا یَکُوۡنُ لِیۡۤ اَنۡ اَقُوۡلَ مَا لَیۡسَ لِیۡ ٭ بِحَقٍّ ؕ؃ اِنۡ کُنۡتُ قُلۡتُہٗ فَقَدۡ عَلِمۡتَہٗ ؕ تَعۡلَمُ مَا فِیۡ نَفۡسِیۡ وَ لَاۤ اَعۡلَمُ مَا فِیۡ نَفۡسِکَ ؕ اِنَّکَ اَنۡتَ عَلَّامُ الۡغُیُوۡبِ</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="text-align: right; white-space: pre-wrap;">مَا قُلۡتُ لَہُمۡ اِلَّا مَاۤ اَمَرۡتَنِیۡ بِہٖۤ اَنِ اعۡبُدُوا اللّٰہَ رَبِّیۡ وَ رَبَّکُمۡ ۚ <strong>وَ کُنۡتُ عَلَیۡہِمۡ شَہِیۡدًا مَّا دُمۡتُ فِیۡہِمۡ ۚ فَلَمَّا تَوَفَّیۡتَنِیۡ کُنۡتَ اَنۡتَ الرَّقِیۡبَ عَلَیۡہِمۡ</strong> ؕ وَ اَنۡتَ عَلٰی کُلِّ شَیۡءٍ شَہِیۡدٌ</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><em>And when Allah says, “O Jesus, son of Mary, didst thou say to men, ‘Take me and my mother for two gods beside Allah?’”, he will answer, “Holy art Thou. I could never say that to which I had no right. If I had said it, Thou wouldst have surely known it. Thou knowest what is in my mind, and I know not what is in Thy mind. It is only Thou Who art the Knower of hidden things.</em></p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><em>“I said nothing to them except that which Thou didst command me—‘Worship Allah, my Lord, and your Lord.’ </em><strong><em>And I was a witness over them as long as I remained among them, but since Thou didst cause me to die, Thou hast been the Watcher over them</em></strong><em>; and Thou art Witness over all things.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<h2 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Context</h2>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">These two verses narrate a conversation between Allah and Isa (A.S) on the Day of Judgement where He asks him whether he told his people to worship others besides Allah. Isa (A.S) denies it and says that he only told them what Allah commanded him but since he died, only Allah was aware of the conditions of his people (i.e Christians).</p>
<h2 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Explanation</h2>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">There are two proofs of his death in this verse. First, he uses the Arabic verb, Tawaffaitani (تَوَفَّيۡتَنِى) for himself which means “<em>Taking of the soul</em>”. Second, the verse also proves that Isa (A.S) of the Bani Israel won’t be the Messiah of the Latter-days as he denies knowing the conditions of Christians on the Day of Judgement.</p>
<h3 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Proof 1:</h3>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">He clearly says Tawaffaitani, a derivative of the verb Tawaffa, which means “<em>to die</em>”. Muhammad (S.A.W) does Tafseer (commentary) of this verse where he explains that the word indeed means death! This is mentioned in the Kitabul Tafsir of Sahih Bukhari.</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Narrated Ibn `Abbas:</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><em>Allah&#8217;s Messenger (ﷺ) delivered a sermon and said, &#8220;O people! You will be gathered before Allah barefooted, naked, and not circumcised.&#8221; Then (quoting Qur&#8217;an) he said:&#8211; &#8220;As We began the first creation, We shall repeat it. A promise We have undertaken: Truly we shall do it..&#8221; (21.104) The Prophet (ﷺ) then said, &#8220;The first of the human beings to be dressed on the Day of Resurrection, will be Abraham. Lo! Some men from my followers will be brought, and then (the angels) will drive them to the left side (Hell-Fire). </em><strong><em>I will say. &#8216;O, my Lord! (They are) my companions!&#8217; Then a reply will come (from Almighty), &#8216;You do not know what they did after you.&#8217; I will say as the pious slave (the Prophet (ﷺ) Jesus) said: And I was a witness over them while I dwelt amongst them when You took me up. You were the Watcher over them, and You are a Witness to all things.&#8217; (5.117)</em></strong><em> Then it will be said, &#8220;These people have continued to be apostates since you left them.</em>&#8220;</p>
<pre><code><a href="https://sunnah.com/bukhari:4625" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sahih Bukhari 4625, Chapter Prophetic Commentary on the Qur'an (Tafseer of the Prophet (PBUH))</a></code></pre>
</blockquote>
<ol>
<li>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">The above narration is from Sahih Bukhari, the most authentic book after the Holy Quran.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">It is under the chapter called “<em>Tafsir of the Prophet (SAW)</em>” which means Imam Bukhari (R.H) put it in this section for a particular reason.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Muhammad (S.A.W) is using the same verse (i.e., 5:116-117), word for word, including the word تَوَفَّيۡتَنِى for himself, in the same time, same context and same place, i.e., the Day of Judgement.</strong></span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Since Muhammad saw has died, then so has Isa a.s. If someone says Isa (A.S) has been taken alive to heaven, then Muhammad saw was also taken up alive with his body, just like Isa a.s.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">We have just seen that the Tafsir of Prophet Muhammad saw clearly tells us that Isa (A.S) has indeed passed away. Who is a better mufassir of the Quran than the Prophet (S.A.W) himself, to whom this Quran was revealed? Can any Muslim still dare to give a meaning other than what he gave?</p>
<p class="" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>All prophets will say the same</strong></span></p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Moreover, this is not a situation that only Muhammad (S.A.W) and Isa (A.S) will face but every single prophet will go through the same exact situation on the Day of Judgement and they will see their companions dragged to Hell and each will question Allah in the same manner.</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="text-align: right; white-space: pre-wrap;">[عن عبدالله بن مسعود:] فَكَيْفَ إِذا جِئْنا مِنْ كُلِّ أُمَّةٍ بِشَهِيدٍ قال: قالَ رسولُ اللَّهِ ﷺ شَهيدٌ علَيهم ما دمتُ فيهِم، فإذا تَوفَّيتَني كنتَ أنتَ الرَّقيبَ علَيهم</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="text-align: right; white-space: pre-wrap;">أحمد شاكر، عمدة التفسير ١‏/٥٠٩ • <strong>إسناده صحيح</strong></p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><em>‘From Abdullah bin Mas’ood (RA): </em><strong><em>So how (will it be) when we bring a witness from every nation</em></strong><em>, he said: The Holy prophet (SAW) said, (I was) a witness over them as long as I remain among them but when you caused me to die You have been a watcher over them’ </em></p>
<pre><code><a href="/s/tawaffaitani-every-nation-shakir.jpg">Umdatul Tafsir Volume 1, page 509 - Sahih Al Isnaad per Ahmad Shakir</a></code></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Thousands of people are quoting the exact same verse, on the exact same place, exact same time, and in the exact same situation, one after the other. Can any Sunni still claim that it means death for thousands of these people but when it comes to Isa (A.S), the meaning of Tawaffa changes completely to something that does not even exist anywhere else in Quran, Ahadith, Arabic lexicons, and Arabic literature?</p>
<p class="" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Non-Prophets/Khulafas will say the same</strong></span></p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">It is not just the thousands of prophets that will use the verse for himself on the Day of Judgment, at the same time, same context, and same place, but Ali (R.A) has also used it to describe his response in the afterlife.</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="text-align: right; white-space: pre-wrap;">حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو خَيْثَمَةَ، حَدَّثَنَا جَرِيرٌ، عَنِ الْأَعْمَشِ، عَنْ سَلَمَةَ بْنِ كُهَيْلٍ، عَنْ سَالِمِ بْنِ أَبِي الْجَعْدِ، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ سَبُعٍ، قَالَ: خَطَبَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ أَبِي طَالِبٍ، فَقَالَ: «§وَالَّذِي فَلَقَ الْحَبَّةَ وَبَرَأَ النَّسَمَةَ لَتُخَضَّبَنَّ هَذِهِ مِنْ هَذِهِ، يَعْنِي لِحْيَتَهُ مِنْ دَمِ رَأْسِهِ»، قَالَ: فَقَالَ رَجُلٌ: وَاللَّه لا يقول ذاك أحد إلا أبرنا عترته، فقال: «أذكر الله، أو أنشد الله، أن تقتل بي إلا قاتلي»، فقال رجل: ألا تستخلف يا أمير المؤمنين؟، قال: «لا، ولكن أترككم إلى ما ترككم إليه رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم»، قالوا: فما تقول لله إذا لقيته؟، قال: أقول: «اللهم تركتني فيهم ما بدا لك، ثم توفيتني وتركتك فيهم، فإن شئت أصلحتهم، وإن شئت أفسدتهم»<strong> إسناده حسن</strong></p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><em>Hazrat Ali (RA) gave us a sermon and said: The one who tore the grain and created the soul, surely this beard and head will be dyed with blood. A man said: By Allah! No one will do that; we will explain it to our children. He (RA) said, &#8220;I remember Allah, or I swear by Allah that I will be killed.&#8221; One man asked: O Amir al-mu&#8217;minin! Won&#8217;t you appoint a caliph? You said: No! But I will leave you as the Prophet SAW has left you. He asked you: What will you say to Allah when you meet Him? You (RA) said: I will tell You have left me ( as an onlooker) in front of them, </em><strong><em>which is clear to you then you caused me to die</em></strong><em>, and then you were left (as an onlooker) over them and if you want to (guide them) then guide them and if you want to (destroy them) then destroy them.</em></p>
<pre><code><a href="/s/tawaffaitani-ali-arabic.jpg">Musnad Abu Yaʽla, pg 443 - Hassan by Husain Saleem Assad</a></code></pre>
<pre><code><a href="/s/tawaffaitani-ali-urdu.jpg">[Urdu Translation here]</a></code></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Meaning of Tawaffa</strong></span></p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Tawaffaitani can never mean to “<em>Take up</em>” when Allah does the action of Tawaffa on a human. It goes against any usage in the Quran, Ahadith, or the Arabic lexicons.</p>
<ol>
<li>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><strong>Tawaffa is used 25 times in the Quran</strong>. It means “<em>Taking of the soul</em>” every single time. <a href="/tawaffa/quran">Check here</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Tawaffa is used many times in ahadith. It means “<em>Taking of the soul</em>” every single time. <a href="/tawaffa/hadith">Check here</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Arabic lexicons agree. <a href="/tawafa/lexicons">Check here</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">The most famous Muslim website that shows Tawaffaitani is Verb Form 5, which means to “<strong><em>pass away</em></strong>” or “<strong><em>die</em></strong>”. <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Check here</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Non-Ahmadi (Sunni and Shias) agree that it means “<em>Taking of the soul</em>”. <a href="/tawaffa/non-ahmadi-translations">Check here</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Challenge of the Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (A.S) to show an example that says “<em>Take me</em>”. <a href="/tawaffa/claim-of-huzur-as">Check here</a>.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<h3 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Proof 2:</h3>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">The second proof that these verses show that Isa (A.S) has died is the conversation between Isa (A.S) and Allah. Isa (A.S) denies knowing the condition of his people (i.e. Christians) on the Day of Judgement as seen from these words, “<em>And I was a witness over them as long as I remained among them, but since Thou didst cause me to die, Thou hast been the Watcher over them; and Thou art Witness over all things”.</em> If he returns for his “2nd coming” as non-Ahmadis believe, then he will see the conditions of Christians worshiping him. Moreover, he will be killing those non-Muslims if they fail to convert to Islam as the Sunnis believe. Then how can Isa (A.S) deny on the Day of Judgement that he did not know whether his followers worshiped him?</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Thus, the only reason Isa (A.S) will be unaware of the condition of his followers (i.e Christians) on the Day of Judgement is that he will not be coming back to earth for a second time. This verse clearly proves that the Latter-Day Messiah will not be Isa (A.S) of the Bani Israel but someone from among the Muslims as explained by the Hadith in Sahih Bukhari that the Messiah will be from among the Muslims.</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Narrated Abu Huraira:</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><em>Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) said “How will you be when the son of Mary descends amongst you and </em><strong><em>is your imam among you.</em></strong><em>”</em></p>
<pre><code>Sahih al-Bukhari 3449</code></pre>
</blockquote>
<h2 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Non-Ahmadi Argument</h2>
<h3 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Argument 1:</h3>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">The word Tawaffaitani does not mean death but means to “<em>take me</em>” meaning that Allah took Isa (a.s) to heaven physically.</p>
<h4 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Refutation:</h4>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">This is already explained extensively above using Quran, Ahadith, Lexicons, and Sunni/Shia translations. <strong>Moreover, there can be no disagreement on this word’s meaning as Muhammad (S.A.W) has used the same verse, word for word on himself, in the same time, context and place</strong>. If it means to take Isa (A.S) to heaven physically, then logic states that Muhammad (S.A.W) is also physically alive in the heavens just like Isa (A.S). Or Isa (A.S) has died just like Muhammad saw has. There is no other option.</p>
<h3 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Argument 2:</h3>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">When the non-Ahmadis cannot prove Tawaffaitani means to “<em>take me</em>”, they claim that it means death, but it will happen on the 2nd coming.</p>
<h4 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Refutation:</h4>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">This actually proves our main point that Tawaffaitani or Tawaffa indeed means death! If they accept this, then they have to concede that Isa (A.S) has indeed died as per the <a href="https://www.alislam.org/quran/app/3:56" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Quran 3:55</a> where Tawaffa is also used for Isa (A.S).</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Regarding their claim that it talks about death in the second coming, it can be easily refuted. The whole point of the verse is to allude that the Christians started worshiping Isa (A.S) and his mother, Mary (A.S) after he died. But if he is supposed to come for his second coming, he will see the conditions of Christians. He will know that he is being worshipped, thus, he cannot deny knowing the condition of his people on the Day of Judgement and in front of Allah. Thus, this proves Isa (A.S) won’t be sent a second time as it would mean he will lie to Allah on the Day of Judgement regarding knowing whether Christians became polytheist.</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Secondly, according to Sunnis and Shias, every People of the Book will believe in him when he arrives on his second coming. If the event in the verses refers to his second coming, then apparently, people are continuing on their old ways (i.e worshiping Isa a.s) which is what he came to fix. Thus, this would mean that not only did he fail his mission on his first coming but rather his second coming also did not prove to be of any use and people continued to worship him and Mary (A.S). The only difference is that now even the Muslims have joined their Christian brothers and sisters in worshiping gods beside Allah. Nauthubillah!</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">This verse below proves that Isa (A.S) wont have the knowledge of who worshiped him, just like any deity that people used to worship other than Allah.</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><em>And remember the day when We shall gather them all together, then shall We say to those who ascribed partners to God, “Stand back in your places, you and your ‘partners’”. Then We shall separate them widely, one from another, and their ‘partners’ will say: ‘It was not us that you worshiped. ‘So Allah is now sufficient as a Witness between us and you. We were certainly unaware of your worship.’</em> (Chapter 10, Verses 29-30)</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Hazrat Mirza Bashiruddin Mahmood Ahmad(ra) states:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;"><em>“The verse speaks of those alleged “partners” whom people set up as equals to God without their knowledge or desire or sanction , e.g the angels or prophets or saints such as Rama, Jesus, etc. The next verse supports this inference in which it is clearly stated that these “partners” will call God to witness that they were utterly ignorant of the fact that they had been set up as equals to, or co-partners with him. The verse further points out that idolaters possessed no evidence for the allegation that the Prophets and saints of the past favoured their deification” (Five Volume Commentary, Chapter 10 Verses 29-30)</em></p>
</blockquote>
<h3 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Argument 3:</h3>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">“<em>And I was a witness over them as long as I remained among them</em>” refers specifically to those followers of Isa (A.S) who were alive at the time of his first coming. If he is denying what Christians did after him, it does not apply to future Christians or those during the time of his 2nd coming. Thus, he will not be aware of the condition of those people when he comes back as he will see latter-day Christians, not his direct followers.</p>
<h4 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Refutation:</h4>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">If they agree the verse refers to his followers on the first coming, then our job is done! Once they agree it refers to his 1st coming, then Tawaffaitani also means death on his 1st coming. Thus, their disagreement regarding the meaning of the word becomes invalid, which proves Isa (A.S) has indeed died just like Muhammad (S.A.W).</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Moreover, it is an extremely absurd argument to say that he won’t know the condition of earlier Christians as they had died before him. It is not a requirement to meet the Christians before him to know that they started worshiping other deities besides Allah. It is evident and clear-cut from history and the Christian practices of today.</p>
<h3 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Argument 4:</h3>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">The last argument that they will use it is not necessary that Tawaffa should mean the same for both Muhammad (S.A.W) and Isa (A.S). The general principle and event should be looked at and everything in that example must not be applied to both contexts. They will give a few examples to prove this point that the parallels are not all exactly the same in both scenarios.</p>
<h4 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Refutation:</h4>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">This is a very weak argument again. There can be no difference in the meaning of the Tawaffa word as Muhammad (S.A.W) and Isa (A.S) will say the same exact sentence as quoted in verse 5:117 in the <strong>exact same place, exact same time, and exact same context</strong> i.e the Day of Judgement. There is no difference in our examples which will give hint to an exception.</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Actually, the parallels are so similar that every single prophet will face the exact same scenario at the Day of Judgement and we have already explained it above. Thousands of people are quoting the exact same verse, on the exact same place, exact same time, and in the exact same situation, one after the other. Can any Sunni still claim that it means death for thousands of these people but when it comes to Isa (A.S), the meaning of Tawaffa changes completely to something that does not even exist anywhere else in Quran, Ahadith, Arabic lexicons, and Arabic literature?</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Those who bring these random claims must re-evaluate whether they are disagreeing for the sake of opposing or they really believe in such conjectures that are no where proven by the Holy Quran or Ahadith from any angle.</p>
<h2 style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Conclusion</h2>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Firstly, verses 5:116-117 prove that Isa (A.S) has died due to the usage of the word Tawaffaitani by Isa (A.S) himself. This verse is used by Muhammad (S.A.W) and Ali (R.A) to describe their own death. Not only that, but each prophet will be using this verse to describe their death on the Day of Judgement. There is no way that the Isa (A.S) is the exception to it. Thousands of people are quoting the exact same verse, on the exact same place, exact same time, and in the exact same situation, one after the other. Can any Sunni still claim that it means death for thousands of these people but when it comes to Isa (A.S), the meaning of Tawaffa changes completely?</p>
<p class="sqsrte-small" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">Secondly, it also proves his death and that the latter-day Messiah won’t be the same person as Isa (A.S) himself because of his unawareness of the fact that his followers started worshiping him and Mary (A.S) after he was not among them. If he is to be sent for a second time, then him denying the condition of his people after his death will amount to lying in front of Allah as he will see his people worshiping him on the second coming.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>
</article>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)

Served from: whiteminaret.org @ 2026-04-16 22:28:52 by W3 Total Cache
-->